Living Off the Land: Detecting Execution That Uses Nothing but Trusted Binaries
When every tool in the intrusion ships with the operating system, signature-based detection has nothing to match. What remains is relationship, context and frequency.
Five detections, in deployment order, with the telemetry each one needs, the noise it produces, and the tuning required before it earns a place in a queue.
Executive summary
Quick facts
These five detections are ordered by value per unit of tuning effort. Deploy them in sequence rather than in parallel: each one changes what "normal" looks like in the queue, and tuning two at once makes it impossible to attribute the noise.
Before writing any logic, confirm the telemetry exists across the estate — not in the lab, not on the servers, across the estate. Most detections that fail in production fail because collection was partial, and a detection with 60% host coverage produces confident negatives that are simply wrong.
Telemetry: service installation events, remote authentication events.
Creating a service on a remote host is uncommon in most estates outside deployment tooling, and it remains one of the most reliable indicators available.
Telemetry: file share access events including share name and source host.
Access to administrative shares from a workstation, rather than from a management host, is a strong signal and inexpensive to evaluate.
Telemetry: authentication logs with source and destination.
Rather than looking for a specific technique, this measures fan-out: how many distinct destinations a single source authenticated to within a window.
Telemetry: task registration events with the creating account and source.
Telemetry: process access events targeting credential stores.
Highest value of the five, and the most demanding: it requires endpoint telemetry that many estates only have on workstations.
| Detection | Technique coverage | Effort | Depends on |
|---|---|---|---|
| Remote service creation | Narrow | Low | Service install logs |
| Admin share access | Narrow | Low | Share audit logging |
| Authentication fan-out | Broad | Moderate | Complete auth logs |
| Remote scheduled tasks | Narrow | Low | Task registration logs |
| Credential access | Broad | High | Endpoint telemetry on servers |
Two broad detections and three narrow ones is a reasonable quarter. It is not comprehensive lateral movement coverage, and it should not be presented as such — overstating coverage is how detection programmes lose the credibility they need to request telemetry investment later.
Confidence is high for the detection logic, which is well established and widely deployed. The effort estimates assume an existing centralised logging platform and an analyst able to spend meaningful time on tuning; without both, the timeline extends rather than the outcome degrading.
Timeline
Verify collection across the estate before writing any logic. Gaps found later invalidate tuning work.
Collect matches without alerting to establish a realistic baseline.
Apply allow sets, then move to live alerting with a named owner per detection.
Repeat the monitor-tune-promote cycle for the remaining logic.
Sources
MITRE ATT&CK
NIST SP 800-92
Related records
When every tool in the intrusion ships with the operating system, signature-based detection has nothing to match. What remains is relationship, context and frequency.